Page 23 - Test PDF v5
P. 23
« Back to Contents ENDOMETRIAL CANCER
LiFE re
Literature for ENYGO
Pathology in endometrial cancer (prognostic factors, EIN, EIC)
Editor Santiago Scasso Other aspects to be highlighted in this literature review:
Descriptive summary Lapinska-Szumczyk et al. analysed 400 formalin-fixed paraffin-em-
bedded primary tumour samples, and reported a molecular subtype
Within the period covered by the 3rd issue of LiFE report, the classification in EC, depending on the hormone receptor status
ESMO-ESTRO-ESGO consensus was one of the most important (Oestrogen Receptor-ER, Progesterone Receptor-PR) and Human
publications on endometrial cancer (EC). Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2) analysed by IHC. Four
molecular subtypes are recognised and show diversity in terms of
The main recommendations of the “Prevention and scree- prognosis, clinicopathological and molecular characteristics, with
ning” working group are as follows: ER+/PR+/HER2- and ER-/PR-/HER2+ groups exhibiting exceptionally
benign and aggressive behaviour, respectively. They have further
A typical hyperplasia (AH)/endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia characterised the subtypes with the known pathways endometrial
(EIN) is the preferred terminology of the precursor lesion of EC. carcinogenesis: PI3K-AKT pathway, TP53 system, and the mismatch
repair (MMR) mechanism. It is to emphasise that the molecular
A H/EIN or grade 1 endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) must be subtype distinction, along with MMR and TP53 status, could become
confirmed/diagnosed by expert pathologist. a useful diagnostic tool for guiding individualised therapy.
M orphology (and not immunohistochemistry (IHC)) should be used Dudley et al. focused on the pathogenesis and prognostic value of
to distinguish AH/EIN from EEC. microsatellite instability (MSI) in EC in their review. MSI usually aris-
es from either germline mutations in components of the mismatch
S ometimes morphological criteria may be supported by IHC markers repair (MMR) machinery (MSH2, MSH6, MLH1, PMS2) in patients
and molecular alterations to distinguish from benign mimic lesions. with Lynch syndrome (LS) or from somatic hypermethylation of the
MLH1 promoter. They reported significant responses of tumours with
T he differential diagnosis of AH/EIN includes endometrial MSI to immunotherapy anti-PD-1 inhibitors in patients who failed
hyperplasia without atypia, glandular and stromal breakdown, conventional therapy. Authors concluded that MSI testing could
focal glandular crowding, and epithelial metaplasia. Loss of PTEN have an expanded role as a tool in the armamentarium of precision
expression and loss of PAX-2 are the only IHC markers sufficiently medicine. 22 %-33 % is the estimated frequency of MSI in EC.
studied and recommended to use on curettage material.
Shikama et al. suggest that analysing MMR status and searching
IHC is not recommended to distinguish atypical polypoid adenomy- for Lynch syndrome may identify a subset of patients with higher
oma (APA) from AH/EIN. sensitivity to adjuvant therapies and favourable survival.
T he precursor of serous carcinoma, serous endometrial intraepitheli-
al carcinoma (SEIC), is considered a non-invasive cancer rather than
a precancer. Molecular alterations of serous carcinoma are already
present in SEIC. A completely negative immunoreactive pattern for
p53 is considered a surrogate for p53 mutation, and is present in
almost all SEIC and invasive serous carcinomas. Therefore, p53 by
IHC is recommended to distinguish SEIC from its mimics.
In selected cases in which cervical involvement may confuse the
origin of the uterine tumour, and considering that endocervical,
ovarian, and endometrial adenocarcinomas may show histopatho-
logical overlap, it is recommended to use a panel of markers
including at least ER, vimentin, CEA, and p16 by IHC. In addition,
HPV analysis can be considered.
W ilms tumour 1 gene by IHC is the recommended marker to deter-
mine the origin of serous cancer.
Continued on the next page Page 23
International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, Volume 26, Supplement #1